Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Headlines

Ya know, sometimes all ya have to do is sit back an' pay attention to the noise.

The noise that all the pundits, commentators, reporters, and talking heads generate as they try desperately to fill 24 hours of unblinking airtime every day.

Wanna know what shape this country of ours is in?

Or where it's headin'?

Just look at the headlines.

MORE JOBS LOST IN MARCH.

NEW ENGLAND FLOODING DROWNS HOMES AND DREAMS.

OBAMA TO OPEN OFFSHORE AREAS TO OIL DRILLING ... Decision Keeps Vast Majority of America's Offshore Energy Resources Off Limits.

BUDGET CUTS MEAN MORE RATS IN NEW YORK.

NORTH KOREAN DEFECTOR IN US URGES "IDEOLOGICAL WARFARE".

FEDS INVESTIGATE DEATH THREATS TO IRS EMPLOYEES AFTER HEALTH BILL APPROVAL.

HOSPITAL TO STOP HIRING EMPLOYEES WHO ARE SMOKERS.

TOP SCIENTIST: WE CAN'T SAVE THE PLANET.

CIA: IRAN CAPABLE OF PRODUCING NUKES.

FRENCH CHEFS LOSE THEIR APPETITE FOR COOKING.

Some of those headlines matter... some don't.

Except for the people living them.

The French Chefs having trouble selling their restaurants probably don't care much about the flooding in New England.

Any more than those people in New England care much about a reservation at a French restaurant right now.

Most Americans probably don't care much about death threats to IRS agents.

But the families of those agents probably care a lot.

The point is, with a twenty four hour a day, seven day a week, instant news cycle, we are barraged by untold numbers of stories about things that don't matter much.

But those same irrelevant stories serve as great camouflage for the ones that matter.

And that camouflage does what it is intended to do by those who manage the news... add distraction, avoid analysis, create diversion.

When the message can be concealed by mischaracterizing the messenger, news can be managed.

When editing becomes opining, news can be managed.

And, when you can overwhelm the receptors of the viewing, listening, and reading public, news can be made to simply disappear.

The great journalists... the Swayze's, the Cronkite's, the Winchell's, the Pyle's, the Payne's, would hardly recognize their craft today.

Analysis and investigation, coupled with multiple sourcing and verification, led them to objectivity in reporting.

Those characteristics are largely gone today, replaced by newsreaders who can look and sound good for ten to fifteen second soundbites.

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle often asked: "How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?"

In today's multimedia world, the impossibility is that every story, every news break, is directly related to what's actually happening.


“More firm and sure the hand of courage strikes, when it obeys the watchful eye of caution.” ---- James Thomson

“Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.” ---- John Philpot Curran












Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Well Said, Mr. Gannon

It is rare that I will repost someone else's writings, as I generally have enough to write about myself.

But this piece by James Gannon is one that says it so well, that I wish I had written it.

The Nation's Pulse  --- America's Quiet Anger

By James P. Gannon on 3.30.10 @ 6:07AM

There is a quiet anger boiling in America.

It is the anger of millions of hard-working citizens who pay their bills, send in their income taxes, maintain their homes and repay their mortgage loans -- and see their government consistently reward those who do not.

It is the anger of small town and Middle American folks who have never been to Manhattan, who put their savings in a community bank and borrow from a local credit union, who watch Washington lawmakers and presidents of both parties hand billions in taxpayer bailouts to the reckless Wall Street titans who brought down the economy in 2008.

It is the fury of the voiceless, the powerless, the ordinary nobodies of Flyover Country who are ridiculed, preached to, satirized and insulted by the Celebrity Loudmouths of the two Left Coasts, the Jon Stewarts and Keith Olbermanns, the Paul Krugmans and their ilk.

It is the salted wound of the millions who see that ruling Democrats in Congress are not listening to them but are willfully ignoring public opinion and the verdict of recent elections in passing a huge new health care entitlement when the existing entitlements of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are already going broke. It is the frustration of those who elected politicians to serve, but found instead that those elected chose to  rule, creating special entitled classes of citizens.

It is the frustrating helplessness of citizens who revere the Founding Fathers and the genius of the Constitution that they wrote, who actually believe the words of the Constitution mean what they say, not more and not less. They who watch politicians and the courts stretch and bend that Constitution -- finding "rights" not enumerated, powers never granted, meanings unimagined -- believe that their country is being redefined without their consent.

Most of the angry are not out marching in the streets, waving signs or shouting into bullhorns. And they are not smashing windows or phoning death threats to politicians. They are simply waking up angry in the morning, and going to bed angry at night. And their resentment is multiplied by the media's efforts to portray them all as dangerous, crazy people, and by the effort of certain Democrats to tar them with brush of violent intent.

They are embittered, too, by the rhetoric of a triumphant president who turns on its head Winston Churchill's heroic attitude promising defiance in defeat but magnanimity in victory. For a president of a deeply divided country, defiance in victory is not an endearing posture. It has all the persuasive charm of a Chad Ochocinco victory dance in the end zone of the opponent's stadium.

These quietly angry people gather in their churches while their religions are called divisive and their beliefs are labeled as bigotry, and they pray for a better day. They talk among themselves in their Main Street cafes, at the Rotary club or at their kids' softball games, seeking others who understand their frustration and will not respond with arrogant dismissal.

They are tired of being told they are too stupid to understand the country's complex problems, too rooted in the past to find solutions, too selfish to share what they have worked for with everyone else who wants it and who has not worked for it.

They are not reaching for guns or for pitchforks. They are holding their anger within, waiting for their time, watching those in power over-reach and over-indulge.

Their wound is deep, and it will not be salved by more presidential speeches, Congressional hand-outs, or promises of wonderful things to come. They no longer believe any of that. Their quiet rage abides, waiting till it can be expressed in that silent place behind the curtain where the ballot lists the names that they have now committed to an angry memory.

And it builds every day, providing them with the energy to recruit their neighbors, co-workers, and their families into a seething underground that will not wane.

Mr. Gannon's opinion mirrors closely what The Oldtimer saw in Searchlight on Saturday, and what he sees in communications from friends around the country.
 
The liberal media and the Dems may believe they have fundamentally changed America, but they are a long way from changing the fundamentals of the electorate.
 
 
“Men are more apt to be mistaken in their generalizations than in their particular observations.” ---- Niccolo Machiavelli
 
“When men are most sure and arrogant they are commonly most mistaken, giving views to passion without that proper deliberation which alone can secure them from the grossest absurdities” ---- David Hume

Monday, March 29, 2010

Tea Party EXTRA

After a weekend of as close to political activism as The Oldtimer is likely to get, there are a few observations that some might find to be of value.

As many of you know, The Oldtimer ventured out to both the Searchlight Tea Party and then to the appearance by Ann Coulter in Henderson later that day.

Coulter first:

Ann is obviously a passionate conservative, well suited to tossing the party faithful some serious red meat.

But, I believe she has fallen for the stereotype that the media have been promoting about the Tea Party conservatives... that they are mostly WASP men with somewhat redneck leanings.

While many of her comments were spot on and delivered with effective humor, many were also right on the limit of racial slurs and homophobia.

That's not going to help the Tea Party movement grow, and in fact, turned off a number of the very people she was trying to motivate to action.

It's clear why she wouldn't allow any media in the arena while she spoke. 

And it's equally clear why the Tea Party movement shouldn't allow her to be seen as a representative spokesperson for their cause.

Her appearance was part of a larger conservative "grassroots Nevada" event, and in many ways was a reasonable follow-on to the Searchlight Tea Party event earlier in the day.

But both events were seriously lacking in one key element necessary to effect any serious change.

The Tea Party movement is trying desperately not to become another political party, most likely because they are fearful of splitting the Republican vote and giving up yet another term to the Democrats.

But in so doing, they're missing their biggest opportunity.

They're highly effective at getting people to get up off the couch and attend their rallies.

They're highly effective in getting clever (and appropriate) signs made.

And, they're highly effective in getting their followers charged up and enthusiastic about doing.....

What exactly?

The thing that was missing from both Tea Party events this weekend is a specific call to action.

A directed means of capitalizing on that enthusiasm and desire for change in a positive, productive way that will support and grow the movement all the way until November.

Whether it's to go out and volunteer for local candidates, or to keep on writing and calling Congress about liberal activities, or even just raising money for national conservative candidates or causes, there needs to be a proactive focus for this excited and capable constituencey.

And the candidates that realize and capitalize on it first, will be gthe big winners in November and after.


“Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” ---  Paul J. Meyer

“Stressing output is the key to improving productivity, while looking to increase activity can result in just the opposite.”  ---- Paul Gauguin

Saturday in Searchlight - Updated!

The Tea Party Express rolled into Harry Reid's hometown on Saturday, with some unexpected results.

While conservatives knew it would attract a large number of supporters,  what they didn't know was that it would expose the blatant hypocrisy and bias that is the liberal slanted mainstream media.

CNN, always an unquestionably objective reporter of the facts as they benefit liberal agendae, gave the following report:


Specifically, in that clip, CNN's Fredericka Whitfield  estimated that "hundreds, if not, dozens of people" were in attendance.

CNN editors then matched her comments with closely cropped aerial footage, that never panned out to a full scene view.

The Oldtimer attended the Searchlight rally, and saw it with his own squinty eyeballs, and he's here to tell you that CNN is full of crap.

Like you needed to be told that, right?

Here's a photo taken by the American Border Patrol of US Route 95 an hour and a half after the rally started.



Two lanes of US freeway totally stopped as people tried to get to the rally.

In fact, the Nevada Highway Patrol closed US 95 at Boulder City for several hours because traffic was so snarled at the town of Searchlight, something almost never done for a few hundred people.

The Oldtimer got there early, and even as we were arriving, people were parking two cars deep on both sides of the freeway more than four miles from the event site, and then walking in.

Being a local, we knew enough to drive on past the event site and check out what was happening in the town of Searchlight proper.

It, too, had double rows of parked cars along both sides of the freeway for several miles, and that was in addition to the acres of parking allocated at the site itself.

Looking at the CNN footage might give people the wrong impresssion, so here's a few aerial shots, again courtesy of American Border Patrol, who had their own chopper in the air.



Obviously, a few dozen people showed up.



Or maybe a few hundred.

Either way, CNN was at it's usual best in objective coverage.

But, CNN wasn't alone.

Network news reports ranged from 1,000 to 7,000 attendance, with local left-leaning papers making minimal mention of the Searchlight event at all.

Nevada Highway Patrol officers on the scene, when asked by The Oldtimer, said they estimated between 15,000 and 20,000 ultimately attended, even though many were unable to arrive before keynoter Sarah Palin had departed for her next stop.

Other impressions:

First, this was among the most well-mannered crowds the Oldtimer has seen.

"Please", "thank you", and "after you" were the words of the day.

And when all those cars parked along the side of the freeway tried to leave?

People waved them into line ahead of them.

No incidents of any kind except two medical incidents brought on by pre-existing health conditions were reported.

(And I'm sure they were fully paid for by O-man's healthcare program.)

The demographics of the crowd were interesting, ranging from elderly folks in power scooters to young teens to young families.

Military, bikers, and even a busload of frustrated union construction workers were in attendance, the construction workers carrying signs saying that Whiney Harry had caused construction to stop in Las Vegas.

Whites, hispanics, and a good number of blacks were in attendance as well, contrary to what the mainstream media would hav eyou believe.

It seems that many minorities take offense of the trashing of the same Constitution that gave them equality.

One young couple with toddlers, when asked if they brought their children to witness history, said "No, we brought them because they're the ones who are going to have to pay for what's been done".

Interestingly, people at the tea party were more outraged about government corruption, backroom deals, and special treatment of lawmakers than about any single bill or other issue.

Whiney Harry spent the day in Las Vegas, opening our new self-supporting public gun range.

Palin quipped that Whiney Harry had "gone to the gun range because he knew he was going to be fired", which of course was met with a rousing ovation.

Based on first hand observation and interaction, there is a substantial movement in America to defeat all incumbents come November.

America's sense of fair play has been violated, and that is a great motivation.

Oh... and all that "tea party violence and hate" you hear about?

The only problem reported all day Saturday in Searchlight was when a few Harry Reid supporters pelted the tea party busses with eggs as they drove through town.

Yep, those tea party people are hateful and violent.... all three dozen of them!

Maybe CNN meant "dozens of eggs" ?

UPDATE!

Here's a photo that you probably won't see on CNN!


SECOND UPDATE!!

One of the egg throwers has been tentatively identified as Brian Dimarzio, the Field Director of the Nevada Democrat Party and a former AFL-CIO Union Leader. You can see the videos HERE
.

"All forms of tampering with human beings, getting at them, shaping them against their will to your own pattern, all thought control and conditioning is, therefore, a denial of that in men which makes them men and their values ultimate." ---- Isaiah Berlin

"The primary symptom of a controller is denial." ---- Keith Miller

Friday, March 26, 2010

"Obama Gonna Pay My Mortgage!"

Remember that video clip from the campaign?

The one where the Negro (Hey, they call it the United Negro College Fund, so why not?) woman crying with joy that she would never have any economic worries again?

The one most people ridiculed because she obviously didn't understand how the process worked?

Guess what?

She was right.

The O-man really is going to pay her mortgage!

And thousands of others as well!

But probably not yours.

You probably don't qualify.

Seems you have to be part of a special group to get this benefit.

Another special interest group favor, provided by the ultimate lobbyist, the O-man hisself.

"The administration plans to overhaul how it's tackling the foreclosure crisis, in part by requiring lenders to temporarily slash or eliminate monthly mortgage payments for many borrowers who are unemployed", senior officials said Thursday.

"Banks and other lenders will reduce the payments to no more than 31 percent of a borrower's income (which would typically be their unemployment insurance), for up to six months with no penalty or negative credit score effects."

"In some cases a lender must allow a borrower to make no payments at all for as long as unemployment benefits remain in effect."


"The new initiatives are expected to take effect over the next half year and will be funded out of money remaining in the $700 billion bailout program for the financial sector," administration officials said.

The announcement comes as the administration faces increasing pressure from lawmakers and housing advocates to overhaul its foreclosure prevention efforts.

So far, fewer than 175,000 borrowers (of the over 4,000,000 home owners struggling to avoid foreclosure) have received permanent loan modifications under its $75 billion marquee program, known as Making Home Affordable.

Mostly because banks and lenders rarely make any modifications to mortgages that are not already in default.

And the Inspector General for the Troubled Assets Relief Program has raised concerns that many borrowers may redefault even after receiving relief under the program.

So, if you're working, struggling to make ends meet, trying to do the right thing, and need some mortgage relief, you've got less than a .05% chance of getting any help from the O-man.

And, if you're the least bit late with your mortgage for any reason, you face credit score dings and possible foreclosure.

But if you're unemployed, you get a free pass, possibly making no mortgage payments for more than a year, with no impacts on your credit score, and no foreclosure or eviction.

With unemployment benefits continually being extended, why the hell would anyone work?

Don't get me wrong... I firmly believe in helping anyone sincerely down on their luck.

In giving them a hand up instead of a hand out.

But many of the very people for whom the O-man is forgiving mortgage payments are the very ones who started this housing crisis by taking mortgages they couldn't afford, with mortgage documentation (or not) that wasn't accurate.

Once again, the people who are doing their damndest to play by the rules are getting run over by the people who make the rules up as they go along.

There's a serious undercurrent of fustration and anger building stronger and stronger in the general populace.

Americans who have been quietly living their lives and trying to do what's right for years are getting vocal about those who aren't.

It's not a racial thing or a religious thing or an economic thing or even a political thing, as many pundits and politicians would have you believe.

It's an ethics thing... people are just fed up with having their sense of fair play violated.

And, they're fed up with the bribes, corruption, back room deals, and plain old bullshit being peddled by their elected officials.

Ronald Reagan used to speak of the "vast, silent majority".

Well, they're finding their voice.

They're finding their motivation.

And they're going to have plenty of ammunition as the real contents of the O-man's agenda come to light.

Americans have always been willing to work hard for a good life --- to build and invest for the betterment of future generations --- to fight for what they believe in.

And, to be charitable to those less fortunate.

But charity is a voluntary activity, not a required redistribution of wealth.

Based on the need of the recipient, not on the political need of the requiring party.

Reagan's silent majority will be silent no longer.


"The American people, the most generous on earth, who created the highest standard of living, are not going to accept the notion that we can only make a better world for others by moving backwards ourselves. Those who believe we can have no business leading the nation." ---- Ronald Reagan

"Government programs, once launched, never disappear." ---- Ronald Reagan

"To me our country is a living, breathing presence, unimpressed by what others say is impossible, proud of its own success, generous, yes and naive, sometimes wrong, never mean and always impatient to provide a better life for its people in a framework of a basic fairness and freedom." ---- Ronald Reagan

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Who's Left?

Once upon a time in a land far away and long ago, the Democrat party had an exhilarating, messianic orator that was widely viewed as their salvation for at least the foreseeable future.

The O-man was appealing to everyone, promising benefits, special programs, widespread entitlements and more, to anyone who would listen.

And listen they did, following up with widespread adoration, and ultimately votes.

The O-man cobbled together a base of the disaffected, the optimistic neophytes, and the traditional Democrat base to create a resounding win, taking office with unusual levels of political goodwill.

Hard to believe that was less than eighteen months ago, a mere second in poltical life.

Now, almost all of his coalition groups have been rudely awakened, and are finding out that their "hope" was misplaced, and that things are always subject to "change.

It's widely known that the SEIU, the Service Employees International Union, along with other unions like the AFL-CIO, was instrumental in the O-man's election.

SEIU head Andy Stern has been the most prolific White House visitor in the O-man's first year in office.

But the unions are becoming impatient and irritated that things they promoted are being delayed, or even outright trampled by the law of unintended consequences.

Healthcare reform was one of their important priorities, for without it, unions would themselves be bankrupted by their own healthcare entitlements, as retiree headconut grew and membership declined.

But now they're finding out that the healthcare bill just enacted will most likely cost their retirees and current employees a great deal as it phases in.


In the first two days after the law was signed, three major companies — Deere & Co., Caterpillar Inc. and Valero Energy — said they expect to take a total hit of $265 million in increased costs due to tax implications of the new bill
In today's economy, that translates to either increased worker participation, or employee layoffs, as companies struggle to stay competitive and profitable.

With more than 3,500 companies now getting tax breaks as an incentive to keep providing coverage, others are almost certain to announce similar cost increases in the weeks ahead as they sort out the impact of the changes caused by the elimination of those tax breaks.

That will undoubtedly result in layoffs of workers, many of whom are union employees.

Figuring out what it will mean for retirees will take longer, but analysts said as many as 2 million could lose the prescription drug coverage provided by their former employers, leaving them to enroll in Medicare's program, with substantially reduced benefits.

"You're increasing the incentive for companies to say 'We don't want to be in the health care business any more, and move employees and retirees to Medicare, a program generally believed to already be in financial trouble'" said James Gelfand, senior manager of health policy for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

"American industrial companies that are struggling to compete globally against companies with much lower labor costs are particularly likely to reduce worker counts and eventually drop retiree coverage", said Gene Imhoff, an accounting professor at the University of Michigan.

"As many as 1.5 million to 2 million retirees could lose the drug benefits provided by their former employer because of the tax changes", according to a study by the Moran Company, a health care consulting firm.

James Klein, president of the American Benefits Council, said between 6 million and 7 million retirees currently get the benefits, and nearly all will be impacted to some degree.

Generally, "retirees would prefer to stay with prescription drug coverage provided by their companies as opposed to enrolling in a Medicare Part D plan", said Marilyn Moon, a health care economist with the nonpartisan American Institutes for Research.

She said "most of the company-sponsored plans are more generous and almost none have the coverage gap that comes with Part D plans."

"That's particularly painful and problematic for people who have substantial expenses at any one point in time," she said.

Deere and Caterpillar were among a group of 10 companies that sent a letter to congressional leaders in December warning of the cost increases and their impacts.

The others were Boeing Co., Con-Way Inc., Exelon Corp., Navistar Inc., Verizon, Xerox Corp., Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. and MetLife Inc., all of whom expect to have to recover the increased costs from their operations by reducing other employee costs, i.e. headcount.
The companies that signed the December letter warned that changing the way retiree drug benefits are subsidized would have a broad impact on the economy, and there are already indications that the effects will trickle down to individuals --- individuals who in these cases, will have union benefits affected as well --- as they move from employment to unemployed union worker.

But it's not just the unions who are becoming disillusioned.

Liberal Dems are fighting mad because the O-man, Whiney Harry, and Princess Nancy allowed the bill to pass without a single-payer public option, something the O-man campaigned on.

Pro-life Dems (yes, there are a few), are angry because the vaunted executive order against funding abortion is an obvious sham that in no way modifies the law now going into effect, which has publicly funded abortion provisions.

A number of powerful American Jewish congreations are upset over escalating tensions between the U.S. and Israel—and may take it out on the Democrats this fall.

Wealthy Jewish supporters of Israel, especially on both coasts, are bitterly opposed to President Obama’s Middle East policies and are harshly critical of the officials who are carrying them out.

James S. Tisch, chief executive of Loews Corp.—the hotel, insurance and oil exploration conglomerate --- a big-money political donor and  longtime activist in Jewish causes and philanthropies ---  voices the suspicions of many:

“I think the president comes to this from Jeremiah Wright’s church, and there’s no doubt in my mind that in Jeremiah Wright’s church, the Palestinians were portrayed as freedom fighters and not as terrorists.

The President has continuously minimzed support for Israel while at the same time extending concilliatory policies to Muslim nations.”

And, the vocal anti-war component of the O-man's coalition has been bitch slapped by his not only endorsing Bush's militray strategies, but expanding them through the surge and the missions into Afghanistan.
It seems no matter where the O-man turns, he faces deeply upset former supporters, each with their own, often irreconcilable, beefs.

Democrat operatives are scurrying to spin the anger over healthcare and other policy issues as being "unsustainable" until November -- after all, it's a good eight months away.

But the truth is that the anger will likely only build, and become more widely dispersed, leaving the Dems with a fractured base unhappy about everything, and looking to get even at the polls --- much as some conservatives acted when they supported the O-man's "change" over McCain. 

If the O-man continues trying to implement his radical agenda, only to run headlong into the realities of the two party process, keeping the anger alive until November shouldn't be an issue.

"Every betrayal contains a perfect moment, a coin stamped heads or tails with salvation on the other side." ---- Barbara Kingsolver



“Betrayal, ... betrayal is the willful slaughter of hope.” ---- Steven Deitz

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

You Are Now A Commodity

One of the most amazing things about the contents of the recently passed Healthcare disaster is the law it chooses to use to justify its constitutionality.

Congress has seen fit to claim the healthcare bill constitutional because the concept of government controlling and regulating interstate commerce has been found previously to be constitutional.

What that really means is that Congress (the government) is now regulating its citizens as items of commerce.

Because you have the ability to travel across state lnes, you are now a commodity, subject to the regulations of the government regarding items of interstate commerce, just as any commodity is.

You're not a person anymore, you're now an item of commerce, to be be treated as such, instead of as a human being.

This was tried once before.

Once before the government regulated people as commerce, prior to the Civil War.

Treating people as commerce items or commodities is widely known as slavery.

And this healthcare bill has at its basis treating people as items of interstate commerce.

Obviously, many pundits and politicians will argue this to be an unreasonable argument.

But, when you are forced to be a consumer because you were born....

When you are mandated by Government to engage in specific commerce solely because you are a living creature....

With punishment handed out for non-compliance, you are being controlled.

If there is a master dictating specific behavior, and punishment comes if you do not behave that way, and you have no say in determining or agreeing to that behavior, that is involuntary servitude.

It will be argued that this is no different than requiring drivers to carry car insurance, but that is a spurious and irrelevant argument.

There are many people in the country who do not, have not, and will not ever own a car.

Hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers, for example, live just fine without a car or car insurance.

You can choose not to own a car.

The healthcare insurance bill requires every American to buy health insurance or be fined.
There is no exclusion.

You have no choice in the matter.

If you're alive and an American, you must buy the insurance.

You can't avoid it.
And since you are involuntarily subjected to both the regulation and the fine, you are now an involuntary servant to the masters in Congress and the Democrat party.

In 1865, the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution ended slavery and involuntary servitude.

In 2010, the O-man's healthcare bill reinstated it.

For everyone.


"I've come to understand that a cultural war is raging across our land, in which, with Orwellian fervor, certain acceptable thoughts and speech are mandated...Underneath, the nation is roiling. Americans know something without a name is undermining the nation, turning the mind mushy when it comes to separating truth from falsehood and right from wrong. And they don't like it..." ---- Charlton Heston

"When we consider that women are treated as property, it is degrading to women that we should treat our children as property to be disposed of as we see fit." ---- Elizabeth Cady Stanton

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Lobbyist in Chief

In his State of the Union Address, the O-man said “We face a deficit of trust — deep and corrosive doubts about how Washington works that have been growing for years.

To close that credibility gap, we have to take action on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue — to end the outsized influence of lobbyists; to do our work openly; to give our people the government they deserve.

That's why -- for the first time in history ..... we've excluded lobbyists from policy-making jobs or seats on federal boards and commissions."
 
Sounds reasonable.
 
Except that he didn't really mean it.
 
Rather, he excluded other lobbyists so that he, and he alone could become the biggest user of cash and favor to influence the votes of elected officials.
 
Which just happens to be the textbook definition of lobbyist.
 
Remember the first go-round on Healthcare?
 
When Louisiana's Mary Landreau changed to a yes vote in exchange for $300 million from Obama?
 
When Nebraska's Ben Nelson got millions in special benefits for Cornhuskers from the O-man just before he changed his vote to yes?
 
And who could forget this past weekend, when Bart Stupak changed his vote (and those of several others) to yes after receiving heavy bene's from the O-man?
 
Stupak has long been a pro-life Democrat, and has frequently and vocally said he would never vote for a healthcare bill that contained public funding for abortion.
 
According to him, because the O-man issued an executive order, stating that there would be no public money used for abortion, everything with the bill was now wonderful and he could vote for it in good conscience.
 
His assurances and vote flip gave confidence and solace to at least five other pro-life Dems, who also changed their votes to yes.
 
Which raises a few of questions:
 
First, if there is no public funding of abortion in the healthcare bill, why do you need an exceutive order to offset it?
 
And second, how many of those other five pro-life Dems who changed their votes knew at the time that Stupak had been bought off  by the O-man with hundreds of thousand of dollars in Federal grants to Stupak's district days before the vote?
 
Yep, three airports in the district of Democrat Bart Stupak were awarded $726,409 in grants by the Obama Administration just two days before a vote on Obama and Pelosi’s government takeover of healthcare.
 
Alpena County Regional Airport received a $85,500 grant, but had only 7,519 passenger boardings in 2008 (the most recent year for which there is information) according to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) data.

Alpena County Regional Airport serves fewer passengers than even the late Rep. John Murtha’s famous “Airport for Nobody.”

Delta County Airport has even less customers than that, but still received a $179,209 grant.

Chippewa County International Airport received a $461,700 grant, but had only 13,733 passenger boardings in 2008.

Each of those grants had been previously turned down in 2010 by the O-man's administration.

In another bribe, Dennis Kucenich, long vocally committed to vote against any healthcare bill not containing a public option, took a one hour ride on Air Force One with the O-man, and stepped off the plane a new man with a newfound supporting vote for the O-man's bill.

Which left many wondering if the O-man's administration was actually using the waterboarding technique on their own.

The O-man didn't "end the outsized influence of lobbyists" to make government better for its citizens.

He ended it to be sure he had no competition, to be sure he would have no opposing views heard when he needed to exercise some Chicago style "persuasion" on those not willing to go along with his agenda.

He ended it so no other lobbyists would shine any light on the extent of his bribery, extortion, and coercion, that when done by anyone else, would be felonious.

Yet few citizens seem aware of those actions, much less appalled by them.

In today's polls, Whiney Harry has an approval rating of only 8%.

Queen Nancy best him by 3% with an approval rating of 11%.

But in both cases, more than 30% of the populace say they "don't know enough about" either Whiney Harry or Queen Nancy to know if they're favorably impressed or not.

The O-man was right about one thing: He's definitely working "to give our people the government they deserve".

At the healthcare bill signing this afternoon, Crazy Joe Biden was heard telling the O-man that "this is a big fucking deal".

For once, Crazy Joe was right.

At least in the first five words he spoke.



“Any path is only a path, and there is no affront, to oneself or to others, in dropping it if that is what your heart tells you.” ---- Carlos Casteneda

“Men are disgusting and, left to their own devices, they will affront the central tenets of human decency - and laugh uproariously at it.”  ---- Jonah Goldberg

Monday, March 22, 2010

A Bipartisan Bill ?

Queen Nancy and Whiney Harry have delivered to the O-man his healthcare disaster.

Whiney Harry convinced the Queen that she should just go along with the Senate version, and she quickly tried to comply, but with minimal success.

It was only when the O-man himself began buying votes with special deals and promises that the Queen began to get any traction.

The O-man, Whiney Harry and the Queen continued to try to portray the problem as "Republicans blocking healthcare", but anyone with an IQ above freezing clearly saw that the problem wasn't the Republicans, but rather members of their own Democrat party.

Republicans don't have enough votes to do anything in Congress that the Dems don't want them to.

They haven't even got enough votes to stop an elevator, much less the healthcare bill.

So, the problem for Whiney Harry and the Queen has been their own members all along.

The Queen has now taken up the rhetoric of bipartisanship, claiming that the healthcare bill was a bipartisan bill reflecting the wishes of the American people.

"You strive for bipartisanship when you can.

When you find your common ground, that's great. If you don't find your common ground, you have to stand your ground," she said.

"And in addition to that, you want bipartisanship, but you cannot let the lack of bipartisanship stand in the way of making this change that is important to the American people.

We've put the wishes of the Republican minority in this bill and it is a historic bipartisan effort."

Um, not exactly.

Perhaps the Queen need to reconsider the definition of bipartisanship.

Because the only bipartisan effort in this whole clusterfuck was the unsuccessful efforts of 212 members of the House of Representatives in trying to defeat it.

See, in the final vote count, absolutely no Republicans voted for the bill.

None.

Making it absolutely not a bipartisan effort.

But, when the final votes were tallied, 39 Democrats voted against their party leadership and the bill, joining all of the House Republicans in a true bipartisan effort to follow the wishes of more than 70% of the American public to try and defeat the bill.

On the morning after, many Americans of both parties are feeling angry and disenfranchised.

Queen Pelosi can call this bill anything she wants, but it may end up being called the beginning of the end for Democrat majorities.

Congress may not have listened to the will of the people now, but they will certainly hear from them at the ballot box in 2010.


"The American citizen must be made aware that today a relatively small group of people is proclaiming its purposes to be the will of the People. That elitist approach to government must be repudiated." ---- William E. Simon

"Show me an elitist, and I'll show you a loser." ---- Tom Clancy

Thursday, March 18, 2010

It Gets Worse After Healthcare

While most of the country and pundits have been consumed with the healthcare issue, some members of the O-man's administration have been looking ahead to what they can screw up during the rest of his term in office.

Don't think our imperial leader is going to stop with healthcare.

Oh no.

There's more to do!

Remember "Cap and Trade", Immigration, and all the other things he spoke about when promising to "fundamentally change the United States of America"?

Let's look at just one small item, and where he intends to lead us.

Right now, he's poised to ban offshore oil drilling on the outer continental shelf until 2012 or beyond.

Supposedly, this ban will accelerate the process for the United States to shift gears to alternative fuels to battle the purported evils of carbon emissions.

This administration, however, views energy policy only through green glasses.

Every aspect of its approach to energy is subordinated to radical environmental concerns.

The O-man wants to force the country to shift its energy production to alternative sources, such as nuclear, solar and wind power.

In theory, there's nothing wrong with that, in the long run, assuming technology can catch up to demand.

But we're nowhere near the green utopia the libs envision, and we won't get there anytime soon.

America needs more oil now to bridge the gap.

So, while the O-man is banning us from drilling oil in offshore areas like the gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean, the rest of the world isn't waiting.

They're drilling now, and doing it right in our backyard.

And then, they'll sell our oil back to us at top dollar.

Right now, Russia is making a bold strategic leap to begin drilling for oil in the Gulf of Mexico.

The Soviets more sensibly view energy primarily as a strategic resource, as many previous U.S. Republican administrations have.

Energy is critical to Russia's economy, as fuel and as a source of profit through export.

Just like it is to us.

Russia also has used energy as a strategic weapon, shutting off natural gas piped to Eastern Europe in the middle of winter to make a point about how dependent the countries are that do business with the Russians.

Now Russia is using oil exploration to establish a new presence in the Western Hemisphere.

It recently concluded four contracts securing oil-exploration rights in Cuba's economic zone in the Gulf of Mexico.

A Russian-Cuban joint partnership will exploit oil found in the deep waters of the Gulf.

Oil that we could be exploiting as well.

But, the Carter administration recognized Cuba has rights to the area in which drilling will be conducted, in the same era as it gave away the Panama Canal.
 
From Russia's perspective, this is another way to gain leverage inside what traditionally has been America's sphere of influence.
 
It may not be as pointed as attempting to use Cuba as a missile platform, but in the energy wars, the message is the same.
 
Russia is projecting power into the Western Hemisphere while the United States retreats.
 
And now, Russia will erect oil derricks off the Cuban coast.
 
Derricks that, on a good day, will be seen from Florida waters.
 
American offshore oil production makes economic sense anytime, but especially in these economic times.
 
It creates jobs and helps fulfill America's vast energy needs.
 
It contributes to the gross domestic product and does not increase the trade deficit.
 
Higher oil supply helps keep a lid on rising prices, and greater American production gives the United States more influence over the global market.
 
American production, refining, and distribution secures a vital national security asset.

And, Americans want our country to drill, in many areas.

A Pew Research Center poll from February showed 63 percent of Americans support offshore drilling for oil and natural gas.

Americans understand the fundamental points:

The oil is there, and we need it.

If we don't drill it out, we have to buy it from other countries, giving them control of a major component of our economy.

The current price of oil makes drilling economically feasible, so why not let the private sector go ahead and get our oil?

Because the O-man would rather apologize to every other nation for American greatness, and give our strategic advantages and economic growth away to the rest of the world.

Just last year, the he even helped Brazil underwrite offshore drilling in the Tupi oil field near Rio de Janeiro.
 
That;s right, he gave away U.S. tax dollars to fund Brazil drilling for oil that we will eventually have to buy back.
 
Tax dollars that could have funded drilling here, and put Americans back to work while
helping our oil independence.
 
So the next time you fill your tank, remember why it costs so much.
 
And whatever you do, save your change.
 
You're going to need it.
 
 
"In ten years, we can reduce our dependence so that we no longer have to import oil from the Middle East or Venezuela. Number one, we need to expand domestic production and that means telling the oil companies the 68 million acres that they currently have leased that they’re not drilling, use them or lose them. " ---- Obama, 2008 third presidential debate against John McCain Oct 15, 2008
 
"Over the last 30 years, countries like Brazil have used a mix of regulation and direct government investment to develop a biofuel industry; 70% of its new vehicles run on sugar-based ethanol." ---- Obama: The Audacity of Hope, by Barack Obama, p.167-169 Oct 1, 2006


Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Stand Up And Be Counted

Never before in our lifetime has it been so urgently important to weigh in on a proposed legislative power grab.

The O-man, the Princess, and Whiney Harry are very, very close to voiding the United States Constitution in their "pass it no matter what" process of passing healthcare.

It is essential that as many voters as possible let them know that we will not stand for it, and that as a consequence of their action they will be voted out of office so the next elected class can undo their tyranny.

Call Congress and tell them to vote no, and to avoid using parliamentary tricks.

It is highly likely that you will receive either a busy signal or a constant ringing, as the Congressional switchboards have been overwhelmed by callers protecting the process for several days now.

No matter.

Call anyway.

Call often.

You will seriously regret it if you do not, as you will have done nothing to try to stop this disaster.

Call the U.S. Capitol Switchboard at (202)224-3121 or (202) 226-3121 and ask for your senators' and/or representative's office.

Or you can email them by using the following database for addresses: 

Tell them what you think, and how you will respond if they vote for the bill or any of the administrative tricks being discussed to pass it without a vote.

Act now.


"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." ---- Edmund Burke

“Regret for the things we did can be tempered by time; it is regret for the things we did not do that is inconsolable.”  ---- Sydney Smith

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Crystal Clear

The "most transparent administration in history" is at it again.

In yet another example of "we're above the scrutiny of the people" and "let them eat cake" mentality, the O-man's State Department, and it's leader, Hillary "the smartest woman in the world" Clinton have screwed up yet again.

Not in foreign diplomacy, this time, although there are plenty of examples of that as well.

Rather in diplomacy with the American people, who at last check, weren't faring all that well under this administrations policies.

See, while the O-man is forcing the issue on healthcare, piling on national debt and deficit for programs most voters don't want, and totally ignoring the jobless numbers in his domestic programming, SWWBP (She Who Would Be President) has gone off on a spending spree of extravagant scope.

Apparently, Hillary has decided to do a little economic stimulus of her own.

And since her department needed a few "personal touches", she decided that some new crystal stemware would be an appropriate splurge.

To you other guys in the audience that are more prone to watch NASCAR than Queer Eye, crystal stemware is wine glasses and stuff like people use for Christmas and Thanksgiving dinner.

I'll give you the fact that the State Department has more than typical demand for these types of things, what with all those hoity toity state dinners for big campaign contributors and foreign dignitaries (occasionally one and the same).

But we're not talking fifty or a hundred pieces of your basic Pottery Barn stuff here.

Oh no.

In the middle of some of the most challenging economic times in our lifetimes, with many people jobless for months, SWWBP goes out and blows $5.4 million to buy fine crystal stemware for American embassies.

Let me say that again: FIVE MILLION, FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS FOR FREAKING GLASSWARE.

I'm thinking there are a bunch of American families that are getting good at making do at drinking out of jelly jars until things get better for them economically.

And they're not drinking fine wine, either.

But here's the real slap in the face to the American people.

The O-man's administration has seen fit to spend  FIVE MILLION, FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS for freaking glassware and absolutely none of those dollars will be going to American companies.

None.

ZILCH.

ZERO.

It's all going overseas, to help bolster the economy and employment numbers of Sweden.

Now I've got no bias against Sweden.

In fact, they're welcome to export as many blondes as they like to the good old USA.

But really.

America has no one who makes fine crystal?

Perhaps SWWBP should remember from whence she came.

Right in her own New York state back yard is one of the most prestigious crystal stemware manufacturers in the United States.

Corning, New York is home to Steuben Crystal, a well known manufacturer of high quality, lead free, crystal.

A firm that has served the needs of the United States government many times since its founding in 1903.

Located in one of the highest unemployment areas in the State of New York.

Steuben didn't even get a chance to bid on the contract, because it was awarded on a no-bid basis.

The exact same kind of no-bid contract that the O-man said was evil and would be ended when he became President.

Under the no-bid contract, some of the crystal is  custom-crafted to include the seal of the United States, although Swedes will do all of the manufacturing.

Now, Federal contracting rules require any American firms that subcontract work to use an American firm (located here) or in rare cases, get a waiver that must be approved at the highest levels of the Department involved.
 
But SWWBP's chosen subcontractor never bothered.
 
Their claim is that the US had no Crystal makers that could manufacturer the stemware without lead.

Steuben says they were never approached or asked, but could and would certainly like to do the work, as they have done for various government agencies many times.
 
And, they continue to produce a spectrum of crystal products without lead.
 
With the economy, at its worst ever, this is not the time to be spending $5.4 MILLION ON FREAKING GLASSES! 
 
Especially when the people who will ultimately have to pay the bill for this crap will not have the opportunity to make it, and maybe recover a bit of their own money.
 
Your administration is transparent, O-man.
 
It's transparently obvious that you and your cabinet members have absolutely no respect for the people of this country.
 
And hopefully, when the voters toss out all the incumbents come election time, their message to you will be crystal clear.
 
 
"Is the patience of the American people that long suffering? Is there no outrage left in the country?" ---- Andrew Greeley



“A civilized society that can no longer feel outrage, can no longer be civilized.” ---- Karl Kraus

Monday, March 15, 2010

Gettin' Cleaned

Harv's Metro Car Wash in midtown Sacramento does a pretty fair job of things in the normal course of business.

Clean your car?

Vacuum your carpets?

Hot wax?

No problem.

Like most car washes in metro areas, it draws a wide variety of clientele, from homeless folks seeking a handout to executives spiffing up their Benzes.

Wednesday was different.

Two official looking guys in a dark car in dark suits with dark sunglasses showed up looking for the owner.

Never a good thing in the movies, and usually equally bad in real life.

"They were deadly serious, very aggressive, very condescending," says Harv's owner, Aaron Zeff.

Gangsters?

Mafia?

Close.

Turns out they were IRS agents demanding payment of delinquent taxes.

And they weren't kidding around.

They had all the official paperwork and all the official notifications.

Most people would be a bit worried when the IRS showed up at their business, but Mr. Zeff knew better.

He told them he'd never been told he owed any taxes and that he's never incurred any late-payment penalties in the four years he's owned Harv's.

In fact, he provided them with an Oct. 22, 2009, letter from the IRS that states Harv's "has filed all required returns and addressed any balances due."

But the IRS agents weren't impressed.

Nor deterred.

They had an official IRS order that had caused them to make a personal collection call to the car wash.

The official IRS order they handed Mr. Zeff showed the amount of money owed to the feds was ... 4 cents.

Inexplicably, the IRS order also showed penalties and taxes accruing on the debt – stemming from the 2006 tax year – were listed as $202.31, leaving Harv's with an obligation of $202.35.

Remember, Mr. Zeff had already provided them with a 2009, letter from the same IRS that states Harv's "has filed all required returns and addressed any balances due."

In other words, not only did the IRS say he owed them nothing, that same IRS sent two agents in an official car all the way over to the car wash to seize less than $250 that he didn't owe.

Zeff, who also owns local parking lots and is the president of the Midtown Business Association, finds the situation a bit comical.

"It's hilarious," he says, "that two people hopped in a car and came down here for just 4 cents.

I think (the IRS) may have a problem with priorities."

This would be just a weird, almost funny story, except for the fact that Zeff now has to go fight the IRS over the four cents and $202.31 in interest and penalties he doesn't owe.

And that the amount continues to accrue interest and penalties daily.

Legal and accounting costs, plus lost time for Zeff to deal with the issue also come into play.

All because the IRS either can't read or doesn't believe its own correspondence.

Which I guess should come as no surprise, since every piece of IRS correspondence regarding taxes since 2005 contains the following disclaimer:

"The advice contained in this communication was not intended or written to be relied upon or used and cannot be used for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service."

Obviously, as in most parts of the government, logic doesn't enter into the equation.

Now if you think this story is absurd (unfortunately, it's all true), just wait until you see their health care plan.

It will clean a lot more than just your car.


"Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." ---- P. J. O'Rourke

"It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself." ----
Thomas Jefferson

Friday, March 12, 2010

A Cowboy Yarn

Ben Thompson was a precocious child.

But then, Texas in the 1850’s was a place that accelerated the development of young men.

When he was 16, our boy Ben wounded another youth during a quarrel, and served a short jail term after paying a fine.

Several years later, he tried his hand as a printer’s typesetter in New Orleans, but found the gambling houses more attractive than an honest day’s work.

Bouncing from place to place, always chasing fortune on the quick, Ben wound up in the Confederate Army, where his career as a soldier was largely undistinguished, save for his penchant for fighting and quarreling with his brothers in arms.

With each fight he got more proficient, more aggressive, and more heartless.

Soon it was all he knew, and he became a mercenary in the Mexican army, where he gained significant renown.

In the early 1870’s, Ben found himself in Ellsworth, Kansas, where his brother had taken up professional gambling.

Ben joined the operation, and the two brothers did well for a couple of years until the local Sherriff intervened in a gambling dispute and angered the brothers Thompson.

Ben’s brother shot the Sherriff dead, and in an effort to help his brother, Ben recruited a large group of Texas cowboys to intimidate the townsfolk long enough for his brother to make his getaway.

Herds of Texas longhorn were now moving up the Chisholm Trail to the railheads of Kansas; by 1873 more than 600,000 steer were in the pens of Abilene.

Returning drovers reported to Ben the town was wide open and a gambler's mecca.

By June Thompson had left the railroad, and arrived in Abilene with enough money to buy a fortnight's lodging and breakfast.

Gambling houses, saloons, and brothels were open day and night, poker and monte games went on continuously with fortunes sliding across the tables.

Ben pawned his six-shooter and sat in the first poker game he could find; when it ended several hours later he had won $2,583.

Another Austin gambler who arrived in Abilene about the same time was Phil Coe, a tall, slender, mild-mannered man who had served on the railroad with Ben.

Coe had several thousand dollars so they formed a partnership and opened the Bull's Head Saloon, the most notorious gambling house and saloon in Abilene's rowdy history.

Wild Bill Hickok wore the town's tin star; the flamboyant lawman, fresh from Hays City, controlled the wildest of Kansas cow towns with only two deputies and his reputation as the deadliest of gunfighters.

He had the difficult task of keeping the wild Texas cowhands under control while still making sure they spent their money in the town.

The Texans found Wild Bill a formidable figure.

A cowhand who had watched Hickok patrol Abilene's streets recalled:

"He wore a low-crowned, wide black hat and frock coat.

When I came along the street he was standing there with his back to the wall and his thumbs hooked into his red sash.

He stood there and rolled his head from side to side looking at everything and everybody from under his eyebrows-just like a mad old bull.

I decided then and there I didn't want any part of him."'

The Bull's Head was a booming success, patronized by the thousands of Texans who came to Abilene with the herds.

The other saloon owners resented its popularity and the legendary tale is that they conspired with Wild Bill to kill Thompson.

From their first meeting Thompson and Hickok viewed each other with suspicion and hostility.

Even without the Bull's Head as a source of disagreement, they would have been enemies on an open prairie.

Ben hated Yankees and Wild Bill was contemptuous of Texans, particularly Texas gamblers.

City officials demanded that Thompson and Coe change the Bull's Head sign, an exaggerated painting of a longhorn's sexual organ.

When the gamblers ignored their complaint, Hickok marched to the saloon and stood outside with a shotgun while painters made the necessary alterations.

Hickok continued to harass the Bull's Head; a few weeks later he forced the owners to move their faro equipment out of the back room to the front of the saloon.

Ben and Wild Bill never had an actual confrontation, but tension mounted every night when the long-haired Hickok walked down Texas Street to enter the Bull's Head's crowded bar.

Thompson thought his troubles were over when John Wesley Hardin came into town with a herd.

The young Texan's reputation as a killer had reached the cow towns but instead of facing the young gunman with a six-shooter, Hickok wisely sat down with Hardin and, over a bottle of champagne, made him promise not to "embarrass the marshal" during his stay in Abilene.

Hickok had delivered the same “request” to Thompson when he had come to town.

A few nights later Hardin killed a man in a fight and left Texas.

Tiring of Abilene, Ben drifted around Kansas until, in 1877, he hooked up with Bat Masterson’s crew of hired gunmen for the Santa Fe Railroad.

By then,  Ben had gained the reputation as one of the most dangerous gunfighters on the frontier.

Prairie gossip credited him with killing twenty-one men, but coroners' inquests, yellowing newspaper clippings, and his many court appearances total his victims at about eight.

Bat Masterson, who probably was a witness to more gunfights and killings during his lawman's career in Dodge City than any man in the West, recalled Thompson's skill with a six-shooter:

"Thompson in the first place, possessed a much higher order of intelligence than the average man killer of his time.

He was absolutely without fear and his nerves were those of the finest metal.

He shot at an adversary with the same precision and deliberation that he shot at a target.

A past master in the use of a pistol, his aim was as true as his nerves were strong and steady.”

Thompson's reputation as a gunfighter had become so widespread that the editor of the New York Sun sent a reporter to Texas to ask Thompson to describe his gunfighter's technique:

"I always make it a rule to let the other fellow fire first.

If a man wants to fight, I argue the question with him and try to show him how foolish it would be.

If he can't be dissuaded, why, then the fun begins but I always let him have first crack.

Then when I fire, you see, I have the verdict of self-defense on my side.

I know that he is pretty certain in his hurry, to miss. I never do.”

In the fall of 1879, Ben Thompson, gunfighter, killer, and gambler, ran for city marshal of Austin.

His campaign circular was simple and direct.

He challenged any man to prove he had ever been dishonest or had ignored the pleas "of the defenseless, timid and weak to protect them from the aggressions and wrongs of the over bearing and strong."

The Robin Hood image failed to enchant the majority of Austin's citizens and he was defeated.

However, at the next election he was elected, by more than two hundred votes.

Curiously, Ben was an excellent police officer.

White, black, or Mexican complainants or prisoners were treated alike.

The crime rate fell and records reveal there wasn't a murder or burglary within the town's limits during his term.

In the summer of 1882 Ben resigned after killing an old enemy, Jack Harris, a well-known Texas gambler and owner of San Antonio's Vaudeville Theatre, probably the best-known nightclub on the frontier.

Its patrons were mostly wealthy cattlemen who not only played for high stakes but also came to see the Irish and German comedy teams, magicians, gymnasts, and the theatre's celebrated high-kicking chorus line.

Ben and Harris had their confrontation at the latter's theatre on July 11, 1882, after an argument over the value of the diamonds Thompson had received as part of his payment in the Colorado railroad "war."

Harris, hearing Thompson was gunning for him, prepared himself with a double-barrel shotgun.

It was twilight when Ben approached the gambling hall and a screen stood between the entrance and the interior of the place.

The theatre's band was blaring on the outside balcony as Ben peered through the blinds and saw Harris cradling his shotgun.

There was an exchange of profanity and Harris swung around to fire but Ben, always fast on the draw, got off the first shot, then fired two more into Harris's body as the dying man vainly tried to pull the trigger of his shotgun.

Ben Thompson was soft spoken, courteous, impulsively generous, and fiercely loyal to his friends.

Confrontation completely changed his personality.

Angered, he became arrogant, belligerent, and ready to fight.

Danger turned him into a calculating, nerveless killer.

There was an inevitability about his death.

He died as he lived, by the gun.

The shootings took place on March 11, 1884, in San Antonio.

Thompson had vowed never again to enter the Vaudville Theatre where he had killed Jack Harris .... "it would be my graveyard," .... he was quoted as saying.

But somehow Ben allowed King Fisher (who has blustered his way into the folklore of the West as a handsome, dashing gunfighter, idolized by every young cowhand who made the trip north with the herds) to persuade him to go to the combined theatre, gambling hall, and saloon.

He knew he had many enemies in the city and had been told that Joe Foster, Harris's partner, had warned the police there would be trouble if Thompson entered his place.

To this day controversy surrounds the death of Ben Thompson and King Fisher.

There are two versions: testimony taken before the coroner's jury on the morning of the double killing and eyewitness statements obtained by reporters for the Austin Statesmen, which indicated both gunfighters had been ambushed and killed.

In Austin, Thompson's friends and admirers, who had given him a triumphal welcome following his acquittal from the Harris shooting, gave him a monumental farewell.

Crowds overflowed the church and the line of mourners stretched for blocks, straining to catch a last glimpse of one of the most feared gunfighters in the west.

Several of the many carriages were filled with weeping orphans.

It wasn't known until the funeral that Ben Thompson, the man killer, had been providing for their clothes and food since he had been a soldier.

In an early note to the orphanage, he said it was "his duty as a gentleman".

Like today, in the 1870's, you just never knew what you never knew.
 
“Those who do not understand the nature of sin and virtue are attached to duality; they wander around deluded.” ---- Sri Guru Granth Sahib
 
“I think it was a brutal time filled with people who were strangely sophisticated and uncivilized. There was a dichotomy between sophistication and viciousness.” ----  Bruno Heller